Skip to content

A Study Comparing the Stability of Two Types of Dental Implants and Bone Growth Around Them Using Guided Bone Regeneration

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF IMPLANT STABILITY AND HORIZONTAL BONE AUGMENTATION OF HYDROPHILIC AND CONVENTIONAL IMPLANTS WITH SIMULTANEOUS GUIDED BONE REGENERATION - A CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC STUDY. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/02/102909
Enrollment
30
Registered
2026-02-03
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: stability and bone augmentation with hydrophilic implants : hydrophilic implant activation using plasma activation and measurement of clincal parameters using 1.ISQ device AT IMMEDIA

Sponsors

INDIAN SOCIETY OF PERODONTOLOGY
Lead Sponsor
GOVERNMENT AUTONOMOUS COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY INDORE
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients presenting with localized edentulous site with horizontal ridge deficiency upto 3mm in maxilla and mandible. 21-55 years of age of both sex and able to sign an informed consent. Maintainable oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients presenting with alveolar ridge deficiency of more than 3 mm. 2.Presence of active periodontal or dental infections. 3.History of allergy or systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, immunocompromising diseases, blood dyscrasias,, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, osteoporosis and with systemic medications like bisphosphonate therapy, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants etc 4.Smokers and/or consuming tobacco in any form. 5.Pregnancy or lactation. 6.Psychiatric illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To clinically evaluate and compare stability of hydrophilic and conventional implant using digital implant stability quotient device (ISQ).Timepoint: a) Baseline b) 3 weeks c) 6 weeks d) 8 weeks e) 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To radiographically evaluate alveolar ridge thickness on CBCTTimepoint: 1) Pre Operative (Rp o) 2) Immediate post operative(Rp1) 3) 6 month post operative (Rp2)

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR SHALEEN KHETARPAL

Government college of Dentistry

drshaleenk@gmail.com9827529603

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026