Comparative Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Periotome Assisted Extraction Versus Conventional Forceps In Single Rooted Primary Teeth: A randomized controlled study

Comparative Evaluation Of Efficacy Of Periotome Assisted Extraction Versus Conventional Forceps In Single Rooted Primary Teeth: A randomized controlled study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/01/102604

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Periotome assisted extraction: Extraction of single rooted primary teeth under local anesthesia Control Intervention1: Conventional forceps: Extraction of single rooted primary teeth un

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Children aged 4 to 10 years requiring extraction of non restorable or over retained single rooted primary teeth Cooperative or minimally anxious children Frankl ratings 3 or 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Special healthcare needs children Frankl behavior rating 1 or 2

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Periotome assisted extraction minimizes trauma compared to conventional forcepsTimepoint: Evaluation will be done at the baseline and 24 hours recall	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Periotome assisted extraction shows less pain, faster healing, and fewer complications compared to conventional forcepsTimepoint: Evaluation will be done at the baseline and 24 hours recall	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDrHinal Kanabar

Pacific Dental College And Hospital

pedodinesh@yahoo.co.in09265289652

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026