A Laboratory Study Comparing Three Materials Used Under Dental restoration to Check Their Effectiveness in Preventing Leakage and Gaps.

Comparative evaluation of 3 different liner in class II restoration using stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope for analyzing microleakage microgaps respectively: An ex vivo dye penetration study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/01/102508

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-30

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: SDR Flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable Dentsply Sirona: SDR Flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable composite used as a cavity liner under composite restoration duration of 2 months. Intervention2: GC Gold La

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Premolar Teeth indicated for extraction during orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Fractured or badly decayed teeth that cannot be isolated with a rubber dam. Medically compromised patients. Patient not willing to undergo treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Microleakage at the gingival seat of Class II cavities restored with composite, evaluated using a stereomicroscope.Timepoint: 8 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Microgaps at the gingival seat of Class II cavities restored with composite.Timepoint: 8 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactHimanshu Upendra Ladole

Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital

deosarkar.bharat16@gmail.com9975581234

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026