Skip to content

Best Physiotherapy Techniques for Scapulocostal Syndrome

Effectiveness of Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique as compared with Scapular stabilization exercises on Functional Capacity, Pain and Quality of life in patients with Scapulocostal Syndrome A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/102096
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M625- Muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified

Interventions

Intervention1: Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique and Scapular Stabilization Exercises: Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique (PMET) is an advanced form of the traditional Muscle Energy Technique (MET), develope

Sponsors

P Aliver Justin
Lead Sponsor
Muthu Neuro Centre
Collaborator

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed with scapulocostal syndrome by using Scapular Compression Test: Stabilizing the scapula during movement can alleviate symptoms if scapular instability is contributing. (Unilateral or Bilateral) 2. Presence of self-reported shoulder girdle dysfunction as indicated by a minimum score of 20% disability on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). 3. Report a minimum pain intensity of 4 and maximum 8 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 7 days. 4. willing to provide informed consent and adhere to the study protocol. 5. Participants with intact neuromuscular control and no evidence of upper motor neuron lesion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Individuals with cervical radiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, cervical spondylosis, or intervertebral disc pathology confirmed clinically. 2.Patients presenting with rotator cuff injuries, adhesive capsulitis, subacromial impingement, or any post-traumatic shoulder pathology will be excluded, as these conditions may independently alter scapular mechanics. 3.Patients who have received corticosteroid injections, or analgesic therapy within the past two weeks. 4.Subjects with spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, kyphosis) or significant postural deviations that affect scapular alignment will not be included. 5.Pregnant or lactating women, and individuals with systemic illnesses affecting musculoskeletal health (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Functional Performance: Measured by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) 2. Pain Intensity: Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0 10) Timepoint: Pre intervention, Post intervention, 2week follow up, 6 week follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary Outcomes: 1. Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL): Measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) 2. Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT): Measured using algometer 3. Range of Motion (ROM): Scapular and shoulder mobility measurements Timepoint: Pre intervention, Post intervention, 2week follow up, 6 week follow up.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMr. Ammuthan

Hindustan Institute of technology and science.

sjenifera@hindustanuniv.ac.in9962448947

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026