Skip to content

A Study Comparing Tube Feeding and Oral Feeding After Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Necrosis

Nasojejunal feeding versus oral feeding following endoscopic drainage of walled off pancreatic necrosis: A Randomized controlled pilot study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101964
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-01-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K859- Acute pancreatitis, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Nasojejunal feeding: Nasojejunal tube will be placed post EUS-CG or oral diet would be started after randomization for 14 days Control Intervention1: Oral feeding: Nasojejunal tube will

Sponsors

PGIMER Chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of acute pancreatitis (AP) with 18-75 years of age 2. Patients with symptomatic WON requiring EUS guided transluminal drainage 3. Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the rate of nutritional failure at Day 14 between Nasojejunal and oral feeding post endoscopic transmural drainage of WONTimepoint: at baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 5 and Day 14

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Infection and new onset organ failureTimepoint: 14 days;Re-intervention needsTimepoint: 14 days

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Saurabh Kumar Singh

PGIMER Chandigarh

drsurindersrana@gmail.com9872199135

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026