FindTrial
Sign In

Advanced vacuum therapy compared to traditional dressings in healing wounds

Comparative study of vacuum assissted closure dressings versus conventional dressings in wound management - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101962
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L979- Non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of lower leg

Interventions

Intervention1: Vacuum assissted closure dressings: Dressings done with Vacuum assissted closure for 5 days and then serial dressings Control Intervention1: Conventional dressings: Simple conventional

Sponsors

Department of general surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diabetic foot ulcers Chronic Non healing wounds

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Wounds with necrotic tissue Untreated underlying osteomyelitis Wounds with recorded bone nerve tendon Wounds with unstable fracture or loose fragments in bone Malignancy in the wound

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to complete wound healing (in days) comparing vacuum assisted closure dressings with conventional dressings.Timepoint: Baseline 5 days 2 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rate of wound size reduction (cm /week).Timepoint: Baseline 5 days 2 weeks—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rana Ranjit Singh

Sri Guru Ram Das University of Health Sciences

gurveer1@gmail.com919876151548

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026