Skip to content

A study comparing two different scoring methods to check patient recovery after general anaesthesia (TIVA)

A Comparative Study of SPEEDS Criteria and the Modified Aldrete Score for Evaluating Postoperative Recovery in Patients Receiving Total Intravenous Anaesthesia - nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101862
Enrollment
135
Registered
2026-01-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: R060- Dyspnea

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

SRM medical collage and research institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 65 years ASA Physical Status I II Undergoing elective surgical procedures under TIVA Consent given for participation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency surgeries Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric disorders History of drug allergies to anaesthetic agents Patients undergoing combined regional and general anaesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the ability of the SPEEDS Criteria to accurately identify postoperative recovery readiness in patients receiving Total Intravenous Anaesthesia, using the Modified Aldrete Score of nine or more as the reference standard for discharge readiness from the Post Anaesthesia Care UnitTimepoint: Assessed at zero minutes, ten minutes, twenty minutes, and thirty minutes postoperatively in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit following extubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr.Vishak Manoj Bhaskar

SRM Medical Collage and Research Institute

vishakm@srmist.edu.in7012980884

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026