Comparison of efficacy of Lidocaine vs Magnesium sulfate nebulization on intubation response in patients undergoing general anaesthesia with oro-endotracheal intubation.

Comparative study of the efficacy of Lidocaine vs Magnesium sulphate nebulization on attenuation of intubation response in patients undergoing general anaesthesia - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 1

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/01/101524

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-19

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: INTERVENTION: NEBULISATION LIDOCAINE Intervention2: INTERVENTION: NEBULISATION MAGNESIUM SULFATE Intervention3: Nil: Nil

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age group of 18 years to 60 years 2. Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 and 2 posted for surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient refusal 2. History of allergy to the study drugs 3. Parturients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and lidocaine on attenuation of intubation response.Timepoint: 18 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
NILTimepoint: NIL	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR. BP MANJULA

Jss Medical College and Hospital, Mysore, Karnataka

bpmanjula5@gmail.com9845501226

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026