Comparison between two medical devices in adult participants undergoing elective surgery.

A prospective randomised study comparing the clinical performance of Proseal LMA and Baska Mask in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/01/101397

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C50-C50- Malignant neoplasms of breast

Interventions

Intervention1: laryngeal mask airways insertion: comparing the hemodynamic changes in patients inserted with proseal-lma and baska mask airway Control Intervention1: Proseal LMA: Proseal lma is a reus

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade 1 and 2 undergoing elective surgery in supine position under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA Grade3/4 pregant patient surgery duration more than 4 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the clinical performance of both the LMATimepoint: postoperatively complications to be assessed for 24 hours if any	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
number of attempts for successful insertion of deviceTimepoint: patients to be assessed for 24 hours postoperatively;orophayngeal seal pressureTimepoint: patients to be assessed for 24 hours postoperatively;complications if anyTimepoint: patients to be assessed for 24 hours postoperatively	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactMonika

LLRM Medical College Meerut

drvipindhama@yahoo.com9760014177

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026