Skip to content

Safety Comparison of Two Radiation Approaches women Undergoing Chemoradiation for Cervical Cancer

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) boost versus Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) to pelvic nodes among patients receiving radical chemoradiation in Carcinoma Cervix: A Prospective, pilot Study comparing safety profiles. - PELICAN- SBRX Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101317
Enrollment
41
Registered
2026-01-16
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: C539- Malignant neoplasm of cervix uteri, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: NOT APPLICABLE: NOT APPLICABLE Intervention2: SBRT: SBRT to the pelvic nodes Intervention3: Arm B: Intervention Arm (Arm B): Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) boost to pelvic nodes

Sponsors

AIIMS New Delhi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 18 years or older with locally advanced cervical cancer suitable for primary treatment with chemoradiotherapy. Pathologically confirmed carcinoma cervix squamous,adenocarcinoma,adeno-squamous carcinoma histology. Patients with stage IIIC disease, who have not undergone previous pelvic radiation therapy or surgery and have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients diagnosed with cervical cancer with pelvic nodal burden less than 3cm or 30cc up to 4 lymph nodes who are eligible for chemo-radiotherapy. Signed informed consent. Adequate end organ function hepatic, renal, cardiac reserve

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with stage I or stage II or stage IV disease Patients with prior malignancies or active autoimmune diseases will be excluded from the study. Other histology melanoma, small cell, basal cell carcinoma Previous pelvic radiotherapy, hysterectomy, any form of oncological treatment. Contraindications to CEMRI, brachytherapy Age less than 18 years. Uncontrolled medical comorbidity.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective is to compare the safety profile of SBRT boost vs SIB to pelvic nodes among patients with Stage III-C carcinoma cervix by assessing the acute GI and GU toxicity (Grade 3 GI/GU toxicity) within 30 days of completion of treatment.Timepoint: The toxicity will be assessed at the following time points: baseline, 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment completion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the dosimetry of organs at risk between the two study arms. ïâ??· To evaluate the efficacy of SBRT in terms of local control using radiological imaging by assessing the response rates, post-treatment (3 months) using RECIST, PERCIST CriteriaTimepoint: 3 months;NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR. KARUN KAMBOJ
karunkamboj04@gmail.com9416613389

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026