FindTrial
Sign In

A study to compare pregnancy results in women undergoing frozen embryo transfer with or without hormone treatment

Comparative evaluation of Reproductive Outcomes between Ovulatory (Natural and modified Natural) cycle and Hormone-replacement therapy cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfers - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101261
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: N979- Female infertility, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, MAHE, Manipal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Women with regular cycles 21 to 35 days More than 5 oocytes retrieved FET using NC, modified NC or HRT protocol Day 3 or Day 5 embryo transfer with Self oocytes (all cycles) and Donor oocytes (except 1st cycle) Pre transfer Endometrial thickness more than or equal to 7 mm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: M llerian anomalies, Uterine anomalies Single ovary PCOS or oligo or anovulation Recurrent pregnancy losses Stimulated cycles Aneuploid embryos ,if PGT A was performed Fresh transfers Grade III cleavage stage and Grade C blastocyst transfers Difficult embryo transfers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare Clinical Pregnancy ratesTimepoint: 2 weeks Beta hCG 6 weeks TVS—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Biochemical pregnancy rateTimepoint: 2 weeks Beta hCG—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Prashanth Adiga

Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, MAHE, Manipal

prashanth.adiga@manipal.edu9035036832

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026