Skip to content

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark Method for Difficult Intravenous Cannulation in Adult Population

Comparison of Ultrasound guided versus conventional method for difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation in adult population

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/101118
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-01-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation using landmark method: After meeting with inclusion criteria peripheral intravenous cannulation will be performed using tourniquet and cannu

Sponsors

Dr Bhawna Bansal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A-DIVA score more than 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 .patients not giving consent 2. pregnant and lactating mothers 3. very sick patients during presentation requiring central line access

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
success rate of intravenous cannulation on first attempt at the time of presentation in emergencyTimepoint: success rate of intravenous cannulation on first attempt at the time of presentation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 number of attempts required for successful cannulation 2 time taken for successful cannulation 3 patient reported pain assessment on VAS scale Timepoint: immediate post procedure and upto one hour post cannulation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Seema Balkrishna Wasnik

ABVIMS and Dr Ram Manohar Lohia hospital ,110001

wasnikseema@gmail.com8527057166

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026