FindTrial
Sign In

A clinical trial to study the effect of two video instruments for introducing a tube in the wind pipe of patients undergoing anaesthesia

Comparative evaluation of Video laryngoscope and The Anaesthetist Society Scope (TAS scope) for intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a prospective, randomised, controlled, double blind trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/100819
Enrollment
114
Registered
2026-01-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Video laryngoscope: Following preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for 3 min, patients will be induced with injection propofol 1.5 2 mg/kg IV and after confirming bag and mask ventilation, i

Sponsors

Manipal Hospital Whitefield
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II and III Patients having a Mallampati grade of III or IV or patients requiring cervical stabilization. Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient refusal for the study Patients undergoing emergency surgery Patients with full stomach Pregnant patients Patients with facio-maxillary trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the laryngoscopic view obtained by TAS scope and video laryngoscope (VLS) using Cormack Lehane grade in patients categorized as Mallampati grade III or IV or patients requiring cervical stabilization.Timepoint: After laryngoscopy (3 minutes after induction)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the laryngoscopic view obtained by TAS scope and video laryngoscope (VLS) using percentage of glottic opening score (POGO score) in patients categorized as Mallampati grade III or IV or patients requiring cervical stabiliTimepoint: After laryngoscopy (3 minutes after induction);To compare the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy with TAS scope and video laryngoscope (VLS) in patients categorized as Mallampati grade III or IV or patients requiring cervical stabilization.Timepoint: After laryngoscopy (3 minutes after induction);To compare the time for laryngoscopy with TAS scope and video laryngoscope (VLS) in patients categorized as Mallampati grade III or IV or patients requiring cervical stabilization.Timepoint: After laryngoscopy (3 minutes after induction)—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKishan Kumar

Manipal Hospital Whitefield

munivenkateshg@gmail.com8121313424

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026