Skip to content

Comparison of two numbing agents and techniques in lower teeth requiring root canal treatment.

Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of 4% Articaine as infiltration vs 2% Lignocaine as nerve block with irreversible pulpitis- A randomized controlled trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/100745
Enrollment
42
Registered
2026-01-09
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: LOCAL ANAESTHETIC AGENTS: Local anaesthetic (LA) agents are drugs that reversibly block nerve conduction when applied locally, producing loss of sensation without loss of consciousness.

Sponsors

UTTARANCHAL DENTAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adults 18 to 60 years of age. 2. Patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis requiring a root canal procedure in their mandibular molars. 3. No prior endodontic treatment. 4. Not on interacting medications. Not currently taking medications that significantly interact with epinephrine or local anesthetics. 5. Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to amide-type local anesthetics, epinephrine, or any component of the study formulations (e.g., sulphites). 2. Patients with significant systemic diseases (ASA Class III or above) such as uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hepatic or renal impairment. Presence of acute swelling, abscess, cellulitis, or trismus in the area of interest that may alter anesthetic diffusion or success. Patients on anticoagulants, antiplatelet therapy, or having coagulopathies, increasing risk of bleeding or hematoma with injection. Pregnant or lactating women will be excluded from the study due to potential risks associated with local anaesthetic administration and ethical considerations regarding fetal exposure.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in Heft Parker Visual Analogue Score (HPVAS 0-170) pre and intra-operative.Timepoint: 10 minutes after administration of local anaesthesia and 10 minutes during procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR RUDRA SANJEEV NARVEKAR

UTTARANCHAL DENTAL & MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE

drpg81@gmail.com09760753244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026