FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Two Common Plaster Methods for Wrist Fractures: Full Cast vs Two Splints in Adults

Comparison of outcomes of distal radius fractures treated by circumferential casting versus dual splinting - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/100550
Enrollment
130
Registered
2026-01-08
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: S525- Fracture of lower end of radius

Interventions

Intervention1: Circumferential casting: Patients with distal end radius fracture are treated with circumferential casting and asked to follow up Control Intervention1: Dual Splinting: Patients with di

Sponsors

Pt B D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who have closed extraarticular distal end radius fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with intra articular fractures, neuro vascular injuries, open fractures and skin lesions will be excluded 2. Patients who opt out at any stage

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess which type of immobilisation, a dual splint versus a circumferential cast, is more optimal to prevent fracture redisplacement in adult patients with a reduced Distal end Radius fracture.Timepoint: Assessment to be done at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Anil

Pt B D Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana

aniltheprince7@gmail.com8929236928

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026