Skip to content

To Compare the efficacy of Intramuscular Vs Intravenous Injection of Vitamin B12 in SAM Children

Comparison of Intramuscular versus Intravenous Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition and Vitamin B12 Deficiency

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/100461
Enrollment
22
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: PCS-

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Dr Varsha Patil R
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Infants and children aged 6 months to 5 years who are admitted to the NRC with severe acute malnutrition with vitamin B12 deficiency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1)Hemoglobin lessthan 5 gper dL requiring urgent transfusion (2)Children with SAM who have acute life threatening complications requiring ICU care, (3)Those with known disorders of B12 absorption or metabolism (e.g. short gut, congenital B12 malabsorption), (4)Those who received vitamin B12 injection per oral in the past 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Biochemical vitamin B12 correction at8 days, defined as serum vitamin B 12 morethan 200 pg per mLTimepoint: Biochemical vitamin B12 correction at8 days, defined as serum vitamin B 12 morethan 200 pg per mL

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemoglobin improvement ii) MUAC gain: Continuous outcome change in mid-upper arm circumference (in cm) from baseline to week 2. We will also assess the average weekly MUAC increment and the proportion of children who achieve MUAC more than 11.5 cm (threshold for exiting SAM) by 4 weeks. iii) Neurological recovery: This is a composite, qualitative outcome. We will use clinical criteria such as improvement in muscle tone (e.g. from hypotonia to normal tone), alertness and activity, and developmental progress. Adverse events: All adverse events will be documented and classified by severity and relation to intervention. Key outcomes will be the occurrence of any injection site complications (like swelling, abscess, nerve injury symptoms) in the IM group versus any IV infusion complications (phlebitis, extravasation) in the IV groupTimepoint: Hemoglobin improvement ii) MUAC gain: Continuous outcome change in mid-upper arm circumference (in cm) from baseline to week 2. We will also assess the average weekly MUAC increment and the proportion of children who achieve MUAC more than11.5 cm (threshold for exiting SAM) by 4 weeks. iii) Neurological recovery: This is a composite, qualitative outcome. We will use clinical criteria such as improvement in muscle tone (e.g. from hypotonia to normal tone), alertness and activity, and developmental progress. Adverse events: All adverse events will be documented and classified by severity and relation to intervention. Key outcomes will be the occurrence of any injection site complications (like swelling, abscess, nerve injury symptoms) in the IM group versus any IV infusion complications (phlebitis, extravasation) in the IV group

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Varsha Patil R

KMCRI , HUBBALLI

vhratageri@gmail.com9448278480

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026