Comparing two handpiece in surgical removal of wisdom tooth - a randomized control study

Comparison of air-driven turbine handpiece vs conventional electric-driven handpiece in surgical removal of mandibular third molars- a randomized control study - NIL

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2026/01/100092

Enrollment

Registered

2026-01-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Surgical Exraction of impacted third molar using straight electric driven handpiece.: Surgical Exraction of impacted third molar using straight electric driven handpiece with extraoral

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: a) Patients age 18 to 50 years. b) Patients with bilateral Impacted Third Molars with similar Pederson Difficulty Index. c) Healthy patients with no systemic co morbidities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: a) Patients with systemic diseases. b) Patients contraindicated for surgical removal of third molars. c) Patients not willing to be a part of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Operating time and post operative sequelae (Pain, Swelling, Healing and Trismus).Timepoint: Outcomes will be assessed on Post-op day 0, 1, 3 and 7. Except operative time which is assessed intraoperatively from incision to closure.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Operating time. Post operative Pain, swelling, Moth opening, Pain scoreTimepoint: on Day 1, 3 & 5	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Kadambari Vivek Kakde

Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai

dr_pradeepds@yahoo.co.in9840722457

Outcome results