Skip to content

A clinical study comparing two modalities for treating keloids: triamcinolone and hyaluronidase injection with and without platelet rich plasma therapy

Comparative study of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection and hyaluronidase with and without platelet rich plasma therapy in the treatment of keloids - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2026/01/0101243
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: L918- Other hypertrophic disorders of the skin

Interventions

Intervention1: intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronidase and platelet rich plasma therapy: 4 doses of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and hyaluronidase injection given at 3 weekly

Sponsors

Dr Baba saheb ambedkar hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinically diagnosed cases of localized keloid aged 18-60 years of either gender. 2. Patients with Vancouver scar score greater than or equal to 4.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or Lactating Women 2. Presence of infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) at or around the keloid site. 3. History of allergy or hypersensitivity to triamcinolone acetonide, hyaluronidase and components of PRP preparation. 4. Patients with History of bleeding disorders (e.g., hemophilia, thrombocytopenia) and Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs that cannot be discontinued. 5. Patients with Immunocompromised States Including those with HIV/AIDS, on chemotherapy, or long-term immunosuppressive therapy 6. Prior intralesional steroid, hyaluronidase, PRP injections to the same keloid lesion within the last 3 months. 7. Current or recent (within 1 month) systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressant therapy. 8. Chronic medical conditions that may affect healing like poorly controlled diabetes mellitus , chronic kidney disease and liver dysfunction or cirrhosis 9. Areas where assessment is difficult (e.g., scalp under thick hair, mucosal surfaces) 10. History of keloid excision in the past 3 months. 11. Patients with widespread keloidosis rather than isolated, well-defined keloid lesions. 12. Ear keloid.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Decrease in Vancouver Scar Scale below 4Timepoint: baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 9 weeks and 12 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
to compare the efficacy between two groups as per verbal rating scale , patient satisfaction score at 3 weeks 6 weeks 9 weeks 12 weeksTimepoint: baseline 3 weeks 6 weeks 9 weeks 12 weeks;to compare the side effect profile between two groups at 3 weeks 6 weeks 9 weeks 12 weeks follow upTimepoint: 3 weeks 6 weeks 9 weeks 12 weeks;to compare relapse rate at 24 weeks in both groupsTimepoint: 24 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBrinda K

Baba Saheb Ambedkar medical college and hospital

viveksagar_sagar@yahoo.co.in9080036451

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026