A Study Comparing Heart Pacemaker Lead Placement Using Intracardiac Echocardiography Versus X-ray Guidance

INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY GUIDED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH AREA PACING - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/12/099980

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-31

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Intracardiac echocardiography guided left bundle branch pacing: study group will undergo Intracardiac echocardiography guided left bundle branch pacing and comparison group will undergo

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients more than 18 years with septal thickness more than 8 mm with any of the following indications: Complete heart block Symptomatic sinus node dysfunction Symptomatic second-degree heart block LBBB with intermittent CHB LBBB with severe LV dysfunction EF less than 35%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Surviving cardiac arrest caused by ventricular fibrillation. Patients with congenital heart disease. Patients with IVC anomalies

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Attempts taken to place the lead in the left bundle area and procedure and fluoroscopy duration.Timepoint: Baseline	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
total procedure duration fluoroscopy duration proximal and selective left bundle branch pacing Timepoint: QRS duration, LV ejection fraction, pacing parameters,	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR AKILESHWAR REDDY

GOVIND BALLAH PANT HOSPITAL

akilesh1179@gmail.com9629951491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026