FindTrial
Sign In

Finding the change in positioning of dental implants with different digital orientation device.

Comparison of accuracy and precision of open and closed sleeve implant surgical guide with pre surgical implant planning A randomised controlled trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099743
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Open sleeve surgical guides: 3.5mm width and 5mm height cyclinder with an offset opening in the buccal aspect of the implant drilling site. This is used in cases for easy insertion oste

Sponsors

Varshavathi
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Unilateral mandibular missing premolars and molars.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Severe acute or chronic periodontitis History of radiotherapy and chemotherapy History of Diabetes and bleeding disorders Clinical or radiographic peri apical pathology Physiological or psychiatric problem Drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the corono-apical, h0rizontal and depth deviation comparing the pre-operative implant planning.Timepoint: Post implant placement - Day 1—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess the hard-tissue changes due to surgical variation during osseointegrative phase of 0, 30, 60 & 90 days. Timepoint: Peri apical radiograph taken on day 0, day 30, day 60, day 90—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr V Anand Kumar

Sri Ramachandra Dental College, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research.

anand_anandhi@hotmail.com9444121616

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026