Skip to content

Comparing the nasotracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and King Vision Video Laryngoscope undergoing General anaesthesia

A comparison of intubating conditions for nasotracheal intubation with standard direct macintosh laryngoscope versus king vision video laryngoscope in adult patients under general anaesthesia - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099692
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-12-23
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: King Vision Video Laryngoscope: Intubation Time Calculated is 23 seconds Intervention2: Standard Direct Macintosh Laryngoscopy: Intubation Time Calculated is 28seconds

Sponsors

Department of Anaesthesiology Government Medical College Kadapa
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Includes American Society Of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status 1 and II Patients that Necessitated Nasotracheal Intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient with Mallampati grading 3 and 4 Body Mass Index of 35kg/m2 Patients with Anticipated Difficult Airway Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intubation TimeTimepoint: Intubation Time 27seconds with Macintosh laryngoscope, 23seconds with King Vision Video Laryngoscope

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
First Attempt Success Rate Modified Cormack Lehane Grading Haemodynamics like Heart rate,saturation,mean arterial pressureTimepoint: Heart rate,oxygen saturation,mean arterial pressure measured before intubation, 1minuter after intubation, 3min after intubation, 5min after intubation

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactBathini vinay

Government medical college kadapa

drvaasu@gmail.com9885225220

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026