FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various Supraglottic airway devices

Comparative Evaluation of Laryngeal Mask Airway(LMA) ProSeal LMA, I-gel, Baska Mask and LMA Protector Supraglottic Airway Devices in Adult Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099682
Enrollment
128
Registered
2025-12-22
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Insertion of Proseal LMA: Oropharyngeal leak pressure, Ease of insertion and Insertion time will be noted and is compared with other supraglottic airway devices Intervention2: Insertion

Sponsors

CHAITANYA A KAMAT
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults undergoing elective Laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia aged 18-60 years. Surgeries lasting up to 120 min or less. American Society of Anaesthesiologist- ASA grade I and II Mallampati grade 1 and II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Upper airway obstruction. -Potential difficult intubation. -High risk of aspiration.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare Oropharyngeal leak pressure of Proseal laryngeal mask airway vs Igel vs Baska mask vs LMA protector in patients posted for elective laparoscopic surgeries.Timepoint: immediately after insertion of device—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare Ease of insertion & Insertion time of Proseal laryngeal mask airway vs Igel vs Baska mask vs LMA protector.Timepoint: During securing of airway with LMA—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr CHAITANYA KAMAT

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical college Belagavi

drchaitanya12@gmail.com8150038305

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026