FindTrial
Sign In

A Study to Find the Best Technique for Keeping Teeth Dry While filling the tooth defects.

EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF 3 DIFFERENT ISOLATION METHODS ON NON-CARIOUS CERVICAL RESTORATIONS: AN IN VIVO SPLIT MOUTH PROSPECTIVE STUDY. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099565
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-12-19
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K031- Abrasion of teeth Health Condition 2: Z768- Persons encountering health services in other specified circumstances

Interventions

Intervention1: RESTORATION OF TOOTH: RESTORATION OF NON CARIOUS CERVICAL LESIONS ON PREMOLARS IN THREE DIFFERENT ISOLATION METHODS Control Intervention1: RESTORATION OF TOOTH: RESTORATION OF NON CARIO

Sponsors

B PRAGNYA
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Medically fit and healthy 2 Minimum of 20 teeth should be present 3 Antagonist teeth should be present 4 3 NCCLs should be present in same arch ( 2 on one side and 1 on other side ). 5 All the NCCLs should be present on premolars. 6 All 3 NCCLs should be similar ( 1.5 mm to 2 mm deep ) 7 Involving enamel and dentin 8 Vital tooth 9 No clinical signs and symptoms 10 Patient willing to sign the consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1 Patient with systemic diseases 2 Poor periodontal health 3 Non vital tooth 4 Mobile tooth 5 Patient with spontaneous hypersensitivity 6 Extremely poor oral hygiene 7 Patients with bruxism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Timepoint:—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Immediately after each isolation method is removed, patients will indicate which method they preferred. This outcome reflects: - Comfort - Perceived ease - Overall patient acceptability 2. Gingival Tissue Damage Associated With Each Isolation Method Evaluated by a periodontist immediately after the procedure and again after 1 week: - Gingival laceration (yes/no) - Gingival bleeding (yes/no) - Gingival sensitivity (yes/no) This outcome assesses the biological impact of each isolation technique on soft tissues. 3. Total Time Required for Restoration For each restoration, the operator will record: - Total clinical time needed to complete the procedure under each isolation method. This outcome helps determine: - Efficiency - Operator convenience - Practicality in routine clinical settings Timepoint: baseline 6 months 12 months—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDR B PRAGNYA

VYDEHI INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE

vids_principal@vimsmail.com9010444355

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026