FindTrial
Sign In

STUDY TO COMPARE COBLATOR(new) AND MICRODEBRIDER (old) METHODS FOR INTENSITY OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN ADENOIDECTOMY

Randomised controlled study to compare coblator and microdebrider methods for intensity of postoperative pain in Adenoidectomy - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099301
Enrollment
134
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J00-J99- Diseases of the respiratory system

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Symptomatic Adenoid hypertrophy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Presence of active infection Bleeding and clotting disorder Overt or submucous cleft palate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare postoperative pain intensity by VAS in microdebrider and coblation methods for adenoidectomyTimepoint: To compare postoperative pain intensity by VAS in microdebrider and coblation methods for adenoidectomy 1)6 hours after the surgery 2)24 hours after the surgery 3) 7 days after the surgery—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.To compare intraoperative blood loss in microdebrider and coblation method for adenoidectomy 2.To compare surgical time in microdebrider and coblation method for adenoidectomy 3.To compare postoperative hemorrhage in microdebrider and coblation methods for adenoidectomyTimepoint: 1. Intraoperative 2.Surgical time 3postoperative hemorrhage will be calculated 6 hours after surgery,on day 1 and day 7—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSomya Maskara

Bharati Vidyapeeth Hospital and Research Centre

Somya.maskara@gmail.com7543806008

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026