Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes of Three Unique Dental Implant Designs A Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation

Evaluation of the clinical success of 3 different dental implants with unique designs A multi-centered retrospective study - Dental Implant and Prosthesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099151
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-12-15
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: Y831- Surgical operation with implant ofartificial internal device as the cause of abnormal reaction of the patient, or of later complication, without mention of misadventure at the time of the procedure

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Intervention3: Nil: Nil Intervention4: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

Mr. Abhishek Masalawala
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Male or female patients aged 18-80 years Patients with single/multiple implants in the anterior esthetic zone Patients with a delayed extraction site and adequate bone volume Patients in whom implants were placed after a defined period of delayed extraction (4-6 months) Patients with healthy gingival tissue without severe periodontal disease Patients evaluated using esthetic assessment tools (Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score) Informed consent and willingness to adhere to postoperative care

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with systemic diseases that could interfere with healing or implant success, including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, arthritis, clotting and bleeding disorders, corticosteroid treatments, chemotherapy, or radiation therapy (within 1 year prior to implantation surgery) Heavy smokers, smoking 6 or more cigarettes per day Chronic alcoholics (consuming alcohol regularly for 10 years) Any other conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which could interfere with the analysis of study results (noncompliance)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidences of adverse events (AEs) including biological events (e.g. redness, bleeding, postoperative pain, discomfort, numbness in nerve distribution areas, peri-implant suppuration and osseous defect, non-integration, flap dehiscence/graft/membrane exposure), adverse device events (ADEs e.g. screw loosening, screw fracture, abutment fracture, implant fracture), and any other AEs reported 3 months after crown placementTimepoint: 1 2 3 Months post Implant

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assessment of oral health at baseline & at 1 2 3 months post-implantation Assessment of postoperative pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS) Analysis of implant stability at 3 months Evaluation of implant prostheses success rate after 3 months of crown placement Evaluation of marginal bone levels at 1 2 3 months post implantation Timepoint: 1 2 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAnkur Sharma

YMT Dental College and Hospital

Salonimistry@ymail.com9821020083

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 4, 2026