FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing two types of neck surgeries over 5 years to find out which one helps patients more.

A Five-Year Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Total Disc Replacement. - NIL.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/099013
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-12-12
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M501- Cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Intervention2: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: NIL.: NIL.

Sponsors

Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Symptomatic single level cervical disc prolapse / stenosis (C3 - C7). Failed more than 6 weeks conservative management.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Revision surgeries Infection Neoplastic conditions Multilevel disease. Incomplete Clinical & Radiological records.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline to follow-up in patient-reported pain and function and index-level motion, assessed by: VAS â??Neck pain (0â??10) (primary pain measure) Neck Disability Index (NDI; 0â??100) Nurick grade (0â??5)Timepoint: Patient will be followed up at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Bharat R Dave

Stavya Spine Hospital And Research Institute

brd_172@yahoo.com09825019913

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 29, 2026