FindTrial
Sign In

To compare electrocautery and ultrasonic dissector in gallbladder dissection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of operative time, blood loss and postoperative complications

Comparative study of monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissection of gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/098989
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-12-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K00-K95- Diseases of the digestive system

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

DR KSHETRIMAYUM ROMANCE SINGH
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Diagnosed with cholelithiasis admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute or gangrenous cholecystitis, gallbladder malignancy, coagulopathies or bleeding disorders, patient with jaundice, use of instruments other than the intended dissector instruments, conversion to open surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, gallbladder perforation rate, postoperative pain scoresTimepoint: 2years—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: nil—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactKSHETRIMAYUM ROMANCE SINGH

REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

shoenil24@gmail.com7005816984

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026