Comparing three tools used to fix cavities in kids molars

Comparative evaluation of clinical efficiency and patient acceptability towards the use of three different dental matrix systems for restoration of class 2 cavities in primary molars: a randomised clinical trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/12/098952

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-11

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: Tofflemeire matrix: in group 1 restoring class 2 cavities using Tofflemeire matrix Control Intervention1: Sectional matrix: in group 2 restoring class 2 cavities using Sectional matrix

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: patient having class 2 cavities frankles behaviour rating 3 and 4 no pulpal involvement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: pulpal involvement any periapical patho;ogy frankles behaviour rating 1 and 2

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time of placement contact point gingival overhanging Timepoint: time during placement contact point after restoration gingival overhanging after restoration	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
patient acceptanceTimepoint: patient acceptance via questionnaire	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Dinesh Rao

Pacific dental college Debari Udaipur

Pedodinesh2003@yahoo.co.in9414158235

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026