Skip to content

To compare the effectiveness of two different powers of homoeopathic medicine (Centesimal and LM Potency) in Reducing the after effects of modern Oncological management

Efficacy of Centesimal potency vis-a-vis LM potency in the management of after-effects of modern oncological treatment - Onco

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/098818
Enrollment
158
Registered
2025-12-10
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 2: T451- Poisoning by, adverse effect of and underdosing of antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drugs

Interventions

Intervention1: Individualised Homoeopathic medicine: Individualised Homoeopathic medicine in centesimal potency Dose: Depending on the laws of susceptibility, it will be Individualized dosage (from s

Sponsors

Nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Confirmed Diagnosis of Cancer: Patients must have histologically confirmed malignancy and have undergone modern oncology treatment such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Experienced Side Effects: Patients should have documented mucositis, nausea, and/or vomiting attributable to cancer treatment (not due to unrelated causes or concurrent illnesses).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age Below 18yrs of age and above 77 yrs Pregnancy and Breast feeding women Neutropenia less than 500 or more than WBC above 25000 Patient should be compliant with the medicine for atleast 6 doses or 2 days which ever is lesser

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To comparing the efficacy of indicated homoeopathic remedy in Centicimal Vs LM potency in reducing the severity of post oncology treatment adverse effects assessed by OMAS SCALE AND CTC scale. Reduction in severity and duration of mucositis as graded by established clinical scales (e.g., WHO Grading Scale for oral mucositis). Measured by standardized scales, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Toxicity Scale or the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS). Reduction in treatment interruptions or delays due to severity of symptoms. Improvement in nausea and vomiting frequency and intensity, often measured by Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) or patient diaries.Timepoint: Baseline to every 15 days to end of study at 3 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the time reduced for the meaningful improvement Hospital visits ? How much and reason for hospitalisation.Timepoint: Baseline to every 15 days to end of study at 3 months;Time until complete resolution of complaints. Compare severity and incidence of adverse events.Timepoint: Baseline to every 15 days to end of study at 3 months;Changes in the weight parameters amongst the enrolled patients.Timepoint: Baseline to every 15 days to end of study at 3 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Dharmendra Sharma

Dr.D.Y.Patil Homoeopathic medical college and research centre,

drsharonaliclinic@gmail.com9822033927

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026