A Study on Comfort of Children and Ease for Dentists Using Three Isolation Methods

Comparative Evaluation Of Ease Of Operator and Patient Acceptability While Using Three Different Isolation Systems In Children-A Clinical Trial - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/12/098254

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: K023- Arrested dental caries

Interventions

Intervention1: using drydent parotid and sublingual absorber for isolation in children: To evaluate and assess the effectiveness of parotid and sublingual saliva absorber pads for isolation in childre

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Children age group between 4 and9 years 2. who had positive or definitely positive cooperation level according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale 3. Children with no history of previous restoration in the selected teeth. 4. Children without any systemic or mental disorders. 5. Molars indicated for class II restorations 6. Children with no known allergy to the materials used in the study. 7. Teeth with no signs of irreversible pulpitis, periodontally compromised teeth. 8. Patients who willfully give assent and for whom the parents or guardian will give the written informed consent to be part of this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Teeth with deep carious lesions involving the pulp. 2. Presence of any systemic disorders. 3.Special healthcare need children. 4.Patients on medications affecting salivary flow 5.Patients with known allergy to latex of rubber dam. 6.Patients who are not willing or for whom the parent or the guardian did not give the written informed consent for the treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of different isolation methods cotton rolls, rubber dam, drydent sublingual and parotid Absorbers for the class II restoration of primary molars among patient aged between 4to9 yearsTimepoint: comparing the effectiveness of different isolation methods during the restoration procedure	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
patient comfort during the restorationTimepoint: patient comfort during the restorative procedure	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Jyothsna V Setty

Sri Siddhartha Dental college and Hospital.

jyothsnasrikanth@gmail.com09449819468

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: May 1, 2026