Comparison of two approaches to block nerves that supply the upper limbs for surgical interventions.

A Comparative Evaluation Of Ultrasound Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Versus Axillary Brachial Plexus Block For Upper Limb Surgery - A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study. - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 2Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/12/098250

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-01

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: NIL: NlL Intervention2: Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: 30 ml of the local anaesthetic mixture ( 10 ml of 2% lignocaine plus 20 ml of 0.5% of bupivacaine) will be infiltrated aro

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA Grade 1 and 2 BMI 18.5 to 24.9

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ASA Grade 3 and 4 Coagulation Abnormalities Infections at site Liver/ Renal/ Heart diseases Pregnancy Neurological deficit

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To Compare The Efficacy Of Duration Of Analgesia In Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Versus Axillary Brachial Plexus Block.Timepoint: From the onset until the effect wears off.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the onset time of effective sensory & motor blockade in costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block.Timepoint: Time taken from giving the block, with assessments every 5 minutes, until adequate sensory & motor blockade occurs.;To compare costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block in terms of intensity of pain, if experienced by the patient using numerical rating scale.Timepoint: Pain assessment using numerical rating scale every 5 minutes until surgical readiness, then every 30 minutes during intraoperative period, & then every 1 hour in the postoperative period.;To compare costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block for the demand of additional analgesia/sedatives if needed.Timepoint: Time taken for first analgesic/sedative demand & total 24-hour analgesic requirement if needed.;To compare the incidence of complications in costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block.Timepoint: Assessment of patient every 30 minutes intraoperatively & every 1 hour in the post-anaesthesia care unit for dyspnea, Horner s syndrome, hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, local anaesthetic toxicity, & pneumothorax.	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare the onset time of effective sensory & motor blockade in costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block.Timepoint: Time taken from giving the block, with assessments every 5 minutes, until adequate sensory & motor blockade occurs.;To compare costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block in terms of intensity of pain, if experienced by the patient using numerical rating scale.Timepoint: Pain assessment using numerical rating scale every 5 minutes until surgical readiness, then every 30 minutes during intraoperative period, & then every 1 hour in the postoperative period.;To compare costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block for the demand of additional analgesia/sedatives if needed.Timepoint: Time taken for first analgesic/sedative demand & total 24-hour analgesic requirement if needed.;To compare the incidence of complications in costoclavicular versus axillary brachial plexus block.Timepoint: Assessment of patient every 30 minutes intraoperatively & every 1 hour in the post-anaesthesia care unit for dyspnea, Horner s syndrome, hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, local anaesthetic toxicity, & pneumothorax.

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr. Qazi Ehsan Ali

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University.

qaziehsanali@gmail.com7417701769

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026