Skip to content

Gum hole technique for Gum covering over the exposed tooth/root surface Using Titanium-Enhanced Platelet Therapy and Amniotic membrane

Pinhole Surgical Technique with T-PRF vs. amniotic membrane for Treating Gingival Recession RT1 and RT2 : A Randomized Controlled Trial - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/12/098247
Enrollment
4
Registered
2025-12-01
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K060- Gingival recession

Interventions

Intervention1: Pinhole surgical technique with amniotic membrane: Disinfection of the surgical site is done with 2% betadine The procedure is carried out under local anesthesia A small (2 3 mm) pinho

Sponsors

Dr Anuswara K
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Systemically healthy patient Subjects with age group of 18- 50years.Patient with good oral hygiene after scaling and root planing.Subject with multiple gingival recession mandibular or maxillary incisors and premolars, RT1 and RT2 Recession. Periodontal pocket depth no more than a 3mm. Patient who have agreed to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Smokers and alcoholics Subjects under medication (bisphosphonate or steroid therapy) for other treatment Subjects with bleeding disorders Subjects who have undergone radiation therapy within the last 2years. Pregnancy and lactating mothers. Subjects who have undergone any invasive periodontal therapy in previous six months. Subjects with cervical abrasion and occlusal trauma. Subjects under anticoagulant medication Subjects with blood- borne infections.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the efficacy and evaluate the outcomes of the Pinhole Surgical Technique with T-PRF vs Amniotic membrane in the treatment of RT1 gingival recessionTimepoint: follow up from baseline ,1month,3month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To assess reduction in recession depth, increase in keratinized tissue width and clinical attachment level following PST with T-PRF To assess reduction in recession depth, increase in keratinized tissue width and clinical attachment level following PST with Amniotic Membrane. To compare the treatment outcome following PST with T-PRF vs Amniotic membranel Timepoint: follow up from baseline ,1month,3month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr MM Dayakar

KVG Dental College and Hospital

mmdayakar@yahoo.com9448167420

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026