Skip to content

A study to assess and compare immediate and delayed crown placement on implants for missing lower back tooth.

A comparative evaluation of immediate loading versus delayed loading of single missing mandibular molars in healed sites using wide bodied implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/098094
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-11-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: IMPLANT PLACEMENET IN THE MISSING MANDIBULAR MOLAR TOOTH REGION WITH IMMEDIATE FUNCTIONAL LOADING OF THE IMPLANTS.: The test sites will be treated with implant placement in the missing

Sponsors

Manasa U
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Age group: 18 - 65years. 2.Healed Single Edentulous first molar site in the mandible with sufficient bone so as to obtain sufficient implant primary stability. 3.Patients with D2 bone quality in the posterior mandible as assessed by CBCT. 4.Opposing occlusion with the natural dentition or fixed restorations. 5.No need for bone augmentation. 6.Medically fit patients for surgery under local anaesthesia. 7.Patients who will strictly follow and maintain proper oral hygiene to prevent peri-implantitis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Medically compromised patients. 2.Chronic smokers. 3.Patients with Para-functional habits. 4.Poor bone quality or volume. 5.Non-compliant patients. 6.Patients with uncontrolled diabetes with HbA1c greater than 7.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Post operative parameters To record the crestal bone level at baseline , 3 months and at 6 months in both test and control groups using cone beam computed tomography scan. The first bone-implant contact at surgery was defined as the baseline level. To compare the implant success rates between the test and control group, if any. Implant failure criteria: 1. Absence of complete extrusion of the implant. 2. Implant should remain clinically immobile on manual testing. Implants not fulfilling both of the above mentioned criteria are considered as failed implants. Timepoint: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Vinayak S Gowda

Vokkaligara Sangha Dental College and Hospital

umeshakenchaiah@gmail.com9008151409

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026