Skip to content

A study comparing two pulpotomy treatment methods for painful permanent teeth.

Comparative Outcome Study of Tampon Pulpotomy Technique with Conventional Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars Diagnosed as Moderate to Severe Symptomatic Pulpitis-A Randomized Controlled Trial. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/098093
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-11-26
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Interventions

Intervention1: Tampon Pulpotomy: Pulpotomy procedure will be performed as par the protocol of the inventors Dr Asgari et. al. using a high speed air-rotor hand piece and the coronal pulp tissue will b

Sponsors

DrDebjyoti Karmakar
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) Permanent mature molar teeth with a probing pocket depth and mobility within normal limits; (2) With a carious lesion reaching the middle or inner third of dentine. (3) With a pre-operative diagnose of moderate to severe symptomatic pulpitis as par Indian Endodontic Society (IES) Pulpal Diagnostic Classification. (4) No signs of sinus tract or swelling. (5) Periapical radiograph indicated a normal periapical status (PAI score 1).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) Pulpal exposure of traumatic origin. (2) Patients with systemic disease that could affect the outcome of treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Clinical success of pulpotomy based on cold test and clinical findings. Outcome classified as: (1) Success: Positive cold response and no symptoms; (2) Uncertain: No cold response but no symptoms; (3) Failure: No cold response with symptoms.Timepoint: Baseline (pre-treatment) 1 month follow-up,3 month follow-up,6 month follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Radiographic Success-Radiographic success based on absence of periapical/pathologic changes. Categorized as: (1) Success: No radiolucency or resorption; (2) Uncertain: Minimal changes not indicative of disease; (3) Failure: Radiolucency, resorption, or signs of pathology.Timepoint: Assessed at Baseline(pre-operative),1,3 & 6 months

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDebjyoti Karmakar

North Bengal Dental College and Hospital

drdebjyoti@yahoo.com9733048062

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026