Skip to content

Comparing Laser Therapy and PEMF with Kaltenborn Mobilization for Neck Pain Relief in Cervical Spondylosis

Effect of Kaltenborn Mobilization Combined with Laser Therapy Versus Kaltenborn Mobilization with PEMF in the Management of Cervical Spondylosis- A Comparative Study - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097851
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-11-21
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M469- Unspecified inflammatory spondylopathy

Interventions

Intervention1: Kaltenborn Mobilization Combined with Laser Therapy: Assess pain, Range of motion and muscle strength by using VAS scale, Goniometer and MMT 4 weeks Control Intervention1: Kaltenborn

Sponsors

Galgotias University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with cervical spondylosis Age 25-50 years Both male and female Limitation of movement Positive test for spurling test Subjects with Chronic pain for the past 3 months Using NPRS scale in which the pain is rating below 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Rheumatoid condition Recent spine surgery or medical history Patients undergo corticosteroid injection Age below 25yrs and above 50yrs Subject with skin infection, any cardiopulmonary condition, or tumors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PAIN ASSESSMENT,RANGE OF MOTION,MUSCLES STRENGHT,POSTURAL ASSESSMENTTimepoint: 8 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NATimepoint: NA

Countries

India

Contacts

Public Contactsakshi kumari

galgotiasuniversity

yash.pratap@galgotiasuniversity.edu.in9268504629

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026