Skip to content

A study to compare the safety and effectiveness of two IV securement dressings, Velfix Edge Plus CHG and Tegaderm CHG in preventing bloodstream infections related to catheters.

A Post-Marketing study, Randomized, Multicentric Clinical Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of an IV securement dressing, VELFIX EDGE Plus CHG in comparison to TegadermTM CHG in Reducing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections. (CRBSIs) - CRBSIs

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097777
Enrollment
246
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: D75- Other and unspecified diseases ofblood and blood-forming organs

Interventions

Intervention1: VELFIX EDGE + CHG: IV securement dressing Total duration would be 7 days post device application. Control Intervention1: Tegaderm CHG: IV securement dressing. Total duration would be 7

Sponsors

Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adults aged 18 to 75 years, of any gender. Hospitalized patients in either Intensive Care Units or general wards. Require short-term vascular catheterization expected to remain in place for a duration of 7 days. Able and willing to provide written informed consent, either personally or via a legally authorized representative (LAR). Agree to allow study data collection according to protocol-defined time points.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age below 18 years or above 75 years. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine, transparent dressings, or adhesive components. Presence of dermatitis, burns, skin lesions, or tattoos at or near the intended catheter insertion site. Any history of bloodstream infection within the preceding 30 days. Central lines inserted in the femoral vein or via a surgical cut-down technique. Use of antibacterial-coated or antiseptic-releasing catheters, including polyurethane catheters designed to release ions or antimicrobial agents. Use of topical antibiotics within a 10 cm radius of the insertion site. Extensive burns covering 15% or more of total body surface area. Current therapy with immune-system modulators (e.g., corticosteroids, biologics, immunosuppressants). Participation in another investigational drug or device study during the study or within 30 days prior to screening. Pregnant females. Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent, either personally or via LAR A Positive HIV test.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparative incidence of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection (CRBSI) within 7 days of catheter insertion between VELFIX EDGE + CHG and Tegaderm CHG, confirmed by blood culture at baseline (day 0), and day 7Timepoint: 7 days from device application

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparative incidence of local skin reactions, dermatitis, or allergic reactions at the catheter insertion site associated with VELFIX EDGE + CHG versus Tegaderm CHG. Comparative microbial colonization at the catheter insertion site, assessed by swab test, with significant colonization defined as more than or equal to 10 CFU per mL for each dressing type. Investigator-reported satisfaction and usability comparison between VELFIX EDGE + CHG and Tegaderm CHG. Comparative device adherence and integrity, including incidence of dressings becoming loose or detached. Overall safety comparison, including adverse events (AEs) related to each device. Timepoint: 7 days from device application

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Pankaj Bablani

Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd

siddharth.pandey@dattmedi.com9315829298

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026