Skip to content

How Surface design affects germ growth on Clear Aligners : A comparison between new Direct printed and regular thermoformed aligners.

Comparative evaluation of Surface properties and Biofilm growth on 3D printed and thermoformed Clear aligners An In Vivo prospective study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097752
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-11-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K038- Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: 3D printed: wearing the 3D printed aligners for 2 weeks Control Intervention1: Thermoformed aligner: wearing the thermoformed aligner for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Dr Robin Mathew Neerumtharappel
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged between 18 years to 40 years with healthy permanent dentition, healthy periodontium, and excellent oral hygiene. Patients that require mild correction of malocclusion within the scope of Clear aligner treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with Craniomandibular disorders, and /or any systemic conditions Patients with Pathological conditions such as Bruxism and clenching Patients who smoke or consume tobacco Patients with poor oral hygiene or poor perceived compliance Patients who are pregnant or are breastfeeding Immunocompromised patients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Surface properties and Biofilm growth.Timepoint: Baseline and After 2 weeks of intra oral use

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
nilTimepoint: none

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Robin Mathew Neerumtharappel

Terna Dental College and Hospital

robin.23pden102@student.nitte.edu.in9930851339

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026