FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of two airway devices in patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia

A Comparative evaluation of performance of newer cuffless supraglottic devices: GMA Tulip versus SLIPA3G:A prospective randomised study in adults patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097445
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-11-14
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z138- Encounter for screening for otherspecified diseases and disorders Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: To compare oropharyngeal leak pressure between GMA-Tulip and SLIPA3G: Patients undergoing general anaesthesia will be intubated under all standard operating protocols using supraglottic

Sponsors

Pt. B.D. Sharma, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Adult patient aged between 18 to 60 years, having ASA status I or II and patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia where placement of supraglottic device is indicated

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Respiratory or Pharyngeal pathology Mouth opening less than 2 cm BMI more than 30kg/m2 Pregnancy Full stomach

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate and compare oropharyngeal leak pressure between GMA-Tulip and SLIPA3GTimepoint: The performace of Two gadgets will be compared after insertion, throughout the operative procedure and removal of device. surgical period may last from one hour to 2 hours. Mean arterial pressure, Heart rate, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement and 5 minutes after device placement—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time taken for device placement First attempt success rate of two devices Ease of device placement Fibreoptic grading of device placement Postoperative patient comfort & satisfaction related to airway deviceTimepoint: Outcome will be assessed after induction, after insertion, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement Mean arterial pressure, Heart rate, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Divya Bindal

Pt.B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak

agarwalbindal45@gmail.com9634525474

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026