Skip to content

To compare the ease of intubation using 2 different airway introducer in artificially created difficult airway in adult patients undergoing for surgery under general anaesthesia

A Comparative evaluation of AIROD vs Bougie Boussignac as an intubation adjunct in simulated difficult airway using video laryngoscope. - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097431
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-11-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: Z138- Encounter for screening for otherspecified diseases and disorders Health Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: AIROD telescopic steel bougie: Fully extended & locked AIROD will be lubricated and preloaded with the lubricated ETT of size 7.0 mm ID in females and 8.0 mm ID in males. The Mc

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Sixty patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation will be included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, restricted mouth opening, pregnancy, full stomach, and any patient who refuses to participate in the study will be excluded from the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the overall success rate of intubation through AIROD and Bougie Boussignac using video laryngoscope.Timepoint: 1.Success of intubation will be assessed after successful ETT placement through bougies

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of passing the introducer. The number of attempts taken to insert the introducer. The total time taken for successful intubation. Hemodynamic changes between the devices. Complications secondary to device placement. Timepoint: 1. Passing the introducer & number of attempts taken. 2. Mean Ease of paArterial Pressure, Heart Rate & SpO2 will be evaluated & observed at Baseline, after induction, One minute after intubation, 3 minutes after intubation & 5 minutes after intubation.

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactGaurav

Pt.B.D.Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak

gmgaurav0007@gmail.com8168999929

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026