Skip to content

A comparison of two airway management devices i.e. GMA-Tulip and i-gel in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia

A prospective randomized comparison of GMA-Tulip versus i-gel in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097430
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-11-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: Z138- Encounter for screening for otherspecified diseases and disorders Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Control Intervention1: GMA- Tulip: An appropriate size of LMA i.e. GMA Tulip (size 3 or 4) will be selected as per manufacturer’s recommendation according to weight. Airway device will be checked befo

Sponsors

NIL
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: One hundred patients of either sex aged 18-60 years belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia where placement of supraglottic device is indicated will be included in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, mouth opening less 2.0cms, Body mass index more 30kgm-2, pregnancy, full stomach, will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the oropharyngeal leak pressure as a measure of placement and airway seal Timepoint: 1. The performace of Two gadgets will be compared after insertion, throughout the operative procedure and removal of device. surgical period may last from one hour to 2 hours. MAP, HR, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement and 5 minutes after device placement

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Assess the time taken for device placement, the ease of insertion & first-attempt success rate Evaluate the device placement by fibreoptic grading Compare haemodynamic responses to device insertion. Assess the postoperative patient comfort Timepoint: Outcome will be assessed after induction, after insertion, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement Mean arterial pressure, Heart rate, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Ananya Bansal

Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak

ananyab1999@gmail.com9899953548

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026