Comparing Two different surgical procedures for cervical spine disease

Clinical and radiological outcomes of stand-alone cage versus anterior plating in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc prolapse – A Comparative Study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/11/097277

Enrollment

Registered

2025-11-12

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M503- Other cervical disc degeneration

Interventions

Intervention1: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF) with Stand alone cage: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) with Stand-Alone Cage – Standard anterior cervical approach is used.

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Age more than 18 yrs MRI proven cervical disc prolapse with radiculopathy/ myelopathy Failed conservative management for 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Age less than 18yrs history of trauma history of infection Previous surgery in the cervical spine Inflammatory arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Veterans RAND 12-Item (VR-12) VAS pain score Neck disability Index Timepoint: 2 weeks , 4 weeks , 3 months , 6 months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Functional Intervertebral Level height Subsidence of inter body device into superior and inferior endplates Cervical lordosis Segmental lordosis Fusion With ct scanTimepoint: 6 months-1 year	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactRamizbhai Memon

srm medical college hospital and research centre

vijayanb@srmist.edu.in97909 63468

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026