Skip to content

implant placement using Lab made versus digital guide.

Evaluation and Comparison of Accuracy of Placement of Implants with Surgical Template versus Surgical Guide- A Clinico – Radiographic Study - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/097170
Enrollment
28
Registered
2025-11-11
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K081- Complete loss of teeth

Interventions

Intervention1: nil: nil Control Intervention1: Nil: Nil

Sponsors

SGT DENTAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients in the age group of 25-60 years inclusive of both genders. 2.Single or multiple missing tooth space. 3.Favourable oral hygiene in the examination visit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The accuracy of implant placement with surgical template will be inferior to that with the surgical guide. Also, less time consumption and better soft tissue healing will be expected with surgical guide compared to surgical template.Timepoint: July 2025-Collection of Materials 1st August 2025-Enrolment of the Patients (14) November 2025-Follow up of 1st 14 Patient 31st January 2026-Enrolment of the Patients (14) April 2026-Follow up of 2nd 14 Patients

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NilTimepoint: Nil

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Amit Bhardwaj

SGT Dental College Hospital and Research Institute, SGT University, Gurugram Haryana

amit.bhardwaj@sgtuniversity.org9818718872

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026