FindTrial
Sign In

Comparison of Fingers Grip and Pen-Holding Grip Techniques for Orotracheal Intubation

A RANDOMISED STUDY TO COMPARE THE-FINGERS GRIP TECHNIQUE VS. CONVENTIONAL PEN-HOLDING GRIP TECHNIQUE TO HOLD AN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE FOR OROTRACHEAL INTUBATION AT SMS MEDICAL COLLEGE JAIPUR. - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/11/096869
Enrollment
300
Registered
2025-11-04
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Comparator Group 1 finger grip technique Comparator Group 2 Conventional Pen-Holding Grip Technique : Fingers Grip Technique Intervention Details Endotracheal tube held using fingers g

Sponsors

Department of AnaesthesiaSawai Man Singh Medical College and Attached Hospital Jaipur
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1 Patient giving written informed consent. 2 Patient undergoing general anaesthesia. 3 Adult patients aged between 18-60 years and both genders. 4 Patients belonging to ASA grade 1 and 2. 5 Patients belonging to Mallampati Grade 1,2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with cervical spine disease. 2. Patients with anticipated difficult airway. 3. Patients with upper airway abnormalities. 4. Patients with body mass index (BMI more than 35 kg/m?. 5. Patients with high risk of aspiration (hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux dise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. The mean number of external assistance required during the procedure in the form of BURP will be documented. 2. Mean time taken for the completion of tracheal intubation by either of the two methods. 3. Mean number of attempts taken. 4. Mean change in Haemodynamic parameters 5. Proportion of patients with complicationTimepoint: 1. The mean number of external assistance required during the procedure in the form of BURP will be documented. 2. Mean time taken for the completion of tracheal intubation by either of the two methods. 3. Mean number of attempts taken. 4. Mean change in Haemodynamic parameters 5. Proportion of patients with complication 6.At the time of intubation; five minutes after intubation, 10 minutes after intubation—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1 hemodynamics changes if any 2 complications if anyTimepoint: At the time of intubation; five minutes after intubation, 10 minutes after intubation—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Rajni Mathur

SMS MEDICAL COLLEGE JAIPUR

RAJNIMATHUR@HOTMAIL.COM9829357194

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026