Skip to content

Study to compare coblator (new) and dissection-snare (old) methods for blood loss in tonsillectomy

Randomized controlled study to compare coblator and dissection-snare methods for blood loss in tonsillectomy - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/10/096701
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-10-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: J353- Hypertrophy of tonsils with hypertrophy of adenoids

Interventions

Intervention1: Dissection-Snare: Instrument used traditionally to remove tonsils Mollisons Tonsillar Dissector and Eves Tonsillar Snare Control Intervention1: COBLATOR: Surgical instrument used to dis

Sponsors

Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients coming to ENT OPD having chronic tonsillitis and Adenoid Hypertrophy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Acute infections Adenoid hypertrophy Coagulopathy Cervical spine pathology Anti-coagulant therapy Immunodeficient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intra-operative blood lossTimepoint: During the surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Surgical time Postoperative pain Tonsillar fossa recoveryTimepoint: 6hours,1day,7day Upto 3 weeks

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAniruddh Sinha

Bharati Hospital and Research Centre

sinhaaniruddh@gmail.com9028979678

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026