Skip to content

Laboratory Comparison of root canal filling Materials Used in Childrens Teeth

A comparative evaluation of effectiveness and flowability of various obturating materials used in primary teeth - An in vivo study - CTRI

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/10/096690
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-10-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical

Interventions

Intervention1: Effectiveness, flowability and patients comfort for obturating materials: Once the obturation is done xrays for those teeth which got obturated must be taken followed by evaluation with

Sponsors

nil
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cooperative children (Frankl’s behavior rating 3 or 4) No history of abscess

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Non-cooperative children (Frankl’s behavior rating 1 or 2) Teeth with internal or external root resorption Developmental defects Fractured teeth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the effectiveness flowability and patients acceptance for zinc oxide and eugenol based obturating materials used for obturation in primary teethTimepoint: Assessment will be done intermediately after the procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients comfort during the obturationTimepoint: Immediately after the treatment

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactR Priyanka

Sathyabama dental college and hospital, chennai

drvishnurekha@yahoo.com8825549560

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026