Effects of magnetic stimulation over scalp in improving the symptoms in parkinsons disease

To compare the Effectiveness of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (LF-r TMS) vs High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-r TMS)in the Rehabilitation of Parkinsons Disease – an observational study - NIL

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3Phase 4

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/10/096608

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-29

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: G20- Parkinsons disease

Interventions

Intervention1: Low frequency stimulation: Group A—intensity: 1Hz, 100% RMT, 12 trains with 50 magnetic pulses on each train, a total of 600 pulses per session. Control Intervention1: High frequency st

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. PD symptomatic for more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Stroke 2. Intracranial metal implant 3. Pacemakers 4. Medication pump implant 5. Cochlear implant 6. History of brain surgery 7. History of seizure or epilepsy 8. Family history of epilepsy 9. Substance abuser 10. History of head trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Berg Balance Scale(BBS)Timepoint: At baseline and after 2 weeks	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)Timepoint: At baseline, after 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks	—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSouvik Bhattacharjee

AIIMS Kalyani

bhattacharjeesouvik141@gmail.com7044544347

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026