Skip to content

Comparing Bone Healing in Dental Implants: Early vs. Delayed Loading with Different Implant Sizes

Assessment of marginal bone response in early and delayed loading protocols with different implant diameters-an in vivo comparative study utilising digital radiographic imaging technology - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/10/096583
Enrollment
24
Registered
2025-10-29
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Nil: Nil Control Intervention1: radiographic marginal bone response: Digital radiographic imaging of marginal bone response in early and delayed implant loading

Sponsors

sameem paikkatt
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Free from any systemic disease. 2.Age limits 18 to 65 of both sexes. 3.Mandibular posterior region with minimum 1.5 mm bone around the implants as per conventional implant placement. 4.Healthy periodontium. 5.Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patients with parafunctional habits. 2.Patients with abnormal ridge relationships. 3.Any unsatisfied bone loss at the time placement. 4.Patients underwent head and neck radiation treatment. 5.Smokers, pregnant, or lactating females. 6.Patients with unacceptable oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The rationale behind this study is to compare marginal bone responses in early and delayed loading protocols with various implant diameters using radiographic imaging technology, with a 6-month follow-up, to provide evidence-based guidance and to improve patient outcomes and treatment efficacy in implant dentistry.Timepoint: The rationale behind this study is to compare marginal bone responses in early and delayed loading protocols with various implant diameters using radiographic imaging technology, with a 6-month follow-up, to provide evidence-based guidance and to improve patient outcomes and treatment efficacy in implant dentistry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
NILTimepoint: NIL

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactSAMEEM PAIKKATT

KMCT dental college

drswapnabhavana@gmail.com9447218893

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026