Skip to content

Comparing two intraocular lens For there stability using multimodal imaging

Comparative Analysis of the Stability of Two Toric Intraocular Lenses Using Multimodal Imaging - Nil

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/10/096477
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-10-27
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Intervention1: Type A ( L haptic ): Type A (L haptic) Toric Intraocular Lens a single piece aspheric hydrophobic acrylic IOL with an L shaped haptic design, implanted in the bag during standard phac

Sponsors

PGI chandigarh
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Presence of cataract with regular corneal astigmatism requiring Toric IOL implantation 3. Axial length ranging between 22 mm and 25 mm 4. Against-the-rule ATR astigmatism 0.75 D or with-the-rule WTR astigmatism More than 1.00 D Preoperatively 5. Willingness and ability to comply with postoperative follow-up for a minimum period of 6 months 6. Rhexis size 5-5.5 mm measured intraoperatively using verion guided system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: History of prior ocular surgery 2. History of ocular trauma 3. Rhexis size 5 mm and 5.5mm. 4. Corneal conditions that could adversely affect visual outcomes, such as scarring or endothelial dysfunction 5. Presence of irregular or decentered pupils 6. Clinically significant zonular weakness 7. Diagnosed glaucomatous optic neuropathy 8. History of uveitis or preexisting retinal pathologies 9. Refusal to randomization or unwillingness to procure assigned lens prior to surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in pseudophakic eyes over a 6- month follow-up period and assess their impact on visual functionTimepoint: 1 month ,3 month ,6 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the positional stability of Toric intraocular lenses over a 6 month follow - up period and assess their impact on visual function. This will be achieved by analyzing the following parameter 17 • IOL decentration (iTrace) • IOL tilt (AS-OCT) • Anterior chamber depth (IOL Master & AS-OCT) • Visual acuity (UCVA & BCVA) • Higher-order aberrations (iTrace) • Strehl ratio (iTrace) 2)To compare the two toric IOL designs included in the study—differing in haptic design and material—based on the above measurements. The objective is to determine whether one lens design demonstrates superior in vivo stability or results in better visual & optical outcomes across the postoperative period.Timepoint: 1 week, 1 month, 3 month , 6 month

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactAtif Irfan

PGI chandigarh

thakur_anchal@yahoo.co.in85578 22773

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026