“Comparing Costoclavicular Block and Interscalene Block for Pain Relief After Shoulder Arthroscopy Done Under General Anaesthesia”

Comparison Of Efficacy Of Costoclavicular Block With Interscalene Block For Postoperative Analgesia In Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Under General Anaesthesi - Nil

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

CTRI

Registry ID

CTRI/2025/10/096144

Enrollment

Registered

2025-10-16

Start date

Unknown

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: M751- Rotator cuff tear or rupture, notspecified as traumatic Health Condition 2: M759- Shoulder lesion, unspecified

Interventions

Intervention1: costoclavicular block: It is a procedure intervention in regional anaesthesia. costoclavicular block will be done under the ultrasound guided 20 ml of .5% of ropivacaine and 4 mg of dex

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients 18-65 years of age belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled to undergo unilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with 1. Known coagulopathies or on anticoagulant therapy, infection at the proposed site of block and known allergies to the effect of local anaesthetics 2. Known preexisting Neurological deficit in the upper limbs 3. Known preexisting lung diseases or hemidiaphragmatic dysfunction 4. Pregnant Women

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
To compare the analgesic efficacy of costoclavicular block and interscalene block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia,as measured by the numeric range scale at 1 hour restTimepoint: At base line and 1 hour	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
To compare NRS at 0 4 8 and 24 hours postoperatively at rest and cumulative NRS score at 24 hrs at rest to asses the time of frist rescue analgesia and to compare total amount of rescue analgesia consumption in each groupTimepoint: 18 month;To assess the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis using USG guided diaphragmatic excursion and pulmonary function test (FVC FEV1 andPFR) using CONTEC spirometer CMS SP100 at baseline and 30 minutes post block and 1 hour in PACUTimepoint: 18 month;To assess the block characteristics like time of performance of block and onset of sensory and motor blockTimepoint: 18 month;To assess total intra operative fentanyl consumption and hemodynamic parameters like HR MAP and spo2Timepoint: 18 month	—

Measure

Time frame

To compare NRS at 0 4 8 and 24 hours postoperatively at rest and cumulative NRS score at 24 hrs at rest to asses the time of frist rescue analgesia and to compare total amount of rescue analgesia consumption in each groupTimepoint: 18 month;To assess the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis using USG guided diaphragmatic excursion and pulmonary function test (FVC FEV1 andPFR) using CONTEC spirometer CMS SP100 at baseline and 30 minutes post block and 1 hour in PACUTimepoint: 18 month;To assess the block characteristics like time of performance of block and onset of sensory and motor blockTimepoint: 18 month;To assess total intra operative fentanyl consumption and hemodynamic parameters like HR MAP and spo2Timepoint: 18 month

—

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr Suman Saini

Vardhman Mahavir Medical College And Safdarjung Hospital

drsainisumannony@gmail.com9891228793

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026