Skip to content

Comparision of positional accuracy in placing Dental Implants using two differnt drilling methods with the help of a Computer Guided System

Comparative Evaluation of Positional Accuracy of Dental Implants Placed with Conventional Drill Osteotomy and Piezoelectric Osteotomy using Dynamic Navigation System - NIL

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CTRI
Registry ID
CTRI/2025/10/095982
Enrollment
32
Registered
2025-10-13
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Condition 1: K082- Atrophy of edentulous alveolar ridge

Interventions

Intervention1: Piezo Electric Osteotomy: Implant osteotomy site preparation using piezo electric tips for 30 to 45 minutes followed by implant placement and positional accuracy assessment using evalun

Sponsors

Dr P Ambica
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients of age between 20-60 years. Missing anterior teeth and premolars ASA I Patients willing to comply with the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Limited mouth opening Teeth with active infections or inflammations Poor comprehense to oral hygiene and Chronic smokers. ASA II,III,IV,V Patients subjected to radiotherapy of head and neck.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Positional AccuracyTimepoint: Base line and Day zero

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Primary stability Insertion TorqueTimepoint: Day Zero

Countries

India

Contacts

Public ContactDr G Narasimha Rao

Vishnu Dental College

narasimhag@vdc.edu.in9491715620

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CTRI (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026